July 01, 2015
Matthew L. Cutler
Principal
St. Louis Metro Office
198 Recent Articles
June 30, 2015
Lessons From the Rare Grant of an IPR Motion to Amend
June 25, 2015
Board Rejects Attempt to Add Testimony to Preliminary Response
June 24, 2015
PTAB vs. Federal Circuit Update
June 16, 2015
Federal Circuit Reverses PTAB on IPR Decision For First Time
June 10, 2015
Objective Basis for Inherency Argument Must Be Contained in IPR Petition
June 08, 2015
Amendments to PATENT Act Proposal Takes Aim at IPR Proceedings
June 05, 2015
Board Denies Petition For Failure to Identify All Real Parties-In-Interest
June 04, 2015
Sloppy Submissions By Patent Owner Earn PTAB Sanctions
May 19, 2015
PTAB Finalizes “Quick Fix” Changes to IPR/PGR Procedure
May 18, 2015
Doctrine of Inurement Does Not Save Design Patent in IPR Proceeding
May 17, 2015
PTAB Issues Subpoenas in Two IPR Proceedings
May 08, 2015
Board Clarifies When Expanded Panel Can Consider an IPR Issue
April 22, 2015
Strategies for Pharma Companies Facing Bass-Like Challenges in IPR Proceedings
April 20, 2015
30 Months of IPR Practice – By the Numbers
April 15, 2015
Live Testimony for Fact Witness Can Be Appropriate at IPR Oral Hearing
April 13, 2015
Toward a Bullet-Proof Petition – Motivation to Combine
April 10, 2015
Which Party Should File Motion to Seal in Inter Partes Review?
April 08, 2015
Pharmaceutical Filings on the Upswing as Power of IPR Becomes More Well-Known
April 03, 2015