August 20, 2019
Bryan K. Wheelock
Principal
St. Louis Metro Office
696 Recent Articles
August 16, 2019
Patent Eligibility Can be Determined on the Pleadings, Provided Claim Construction is Not at Issue
August 16, 2019
Liberal Application of Relation Back Doctrine Saved Infringement Claims from Being Time Barred
August 14, 2019
Any Compound May Look Obvious Once Someone Has Made it, But Federal Circuit Rejects Convoluted Obviousness Argument
August 12, 2019
Board Erred in Failing to Apply § 112, Paragraph 6 to Mechanical Control Assembly
August 12, 2019
Arguments Regarding Enablement Confirm Narrow Scope of Claims
August 09, 2019
Merely Tangential Exception to Prosecution History Estoppel Saved Inartful Amendment from Barring Infringement by Equivalents
June 24, 2019
One Applicant Gets his Registration, but all Trademark Owners may be F-U-C-T
June 05, 2019
Form-seekers and Non-disclosure Agreements
June 04, 2019
Does Your Trademark Have a 401(k)?
May 30, 2019
Infringement was a Matter of Degree
May 30, 2019
Lack of All Substantial Rights Deprived Plaintiff of Statutory Standing, But Not Article III Standing
May 23, 2019
We Shall fight in the Fields and in the Streets, We Shall Fight in the Hills; We Shall Never Surrender.
May 21, 2019
Detailed Explanation and Corroboration Made “Sham Affidavit” Doctrine Inapplicable
May 20, 2019
Trademark Licensees Keep Their Rights When Their Bankrupt Licensors Reject the Licenses
May 15, 2019
The Written Description Must Provide More than A Mere Wish or Hope that the Invention Would Work
May 14, 2019
Patent’s Description Was Inconsistent with Patentee’s Claim Construction
May 13, 2019
Another IPR Petitioner Had No Standing to Appeal; Does Estoppel Apply to Such Petitioners?
May 13, 2019
Lack of Reasonable Expectation of Success Meant Claims Weren’t Obvious
May 02, 2019